AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION INC Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (form 10-Q)
[ad_1]
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or Quarterly Report, “we,” “our,” “us,”
“the Company” and similar terms refer to
“APEI,” and its subsidiary institutions collectively unless the context
indicates otherwise. The following discussion of our historical results of
operations and our liquidity and capital resources should be read in conjunction
with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes that appear
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and the audited financial information and
related notes, as well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and other disclosures, included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
Annual Report.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements intended to be covered
by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. We may use
words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,”
“should,” “would,” “could,” “potentially,” “will,” or “may,” or other words that
convey uncertainty of future events, conditions, circumstances, or outcomes to
identify these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this
Quarterly Report include, without limitation, statements regarding:
•actions by theDepartment of Defense , orDoD , or branches ofthe United States Armed Forces, including actions related to the disruption and suspension ofDoD tuition assistance programs and ArmyIgnitED, and their and our expectations regarding the effects of those actions; •our expectations regarding the effects of and our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the demand environment for online education or nursing education as the pandemic abates, impacts on business operations and our financial results, and our ability to comply with regulations related to emergency relief; •changes to and expectations regarding our student enrollment, net course registrations, and the composition of our student body, including the pace of such changes; •our ability to maintain, develop, and grow our technology infrastructure to support our student body; •our conversion of prospective students to enrolled students and our retention of active students; •our ability to update and expand the content of existing programs and develop new programs to meet emerging student needs and marketplace demands, and our ability to do so in a cost-effective manner or on a timely basis; •our plans for, marketing of, and initiatives at, our institutions; •our maintenance and expansion of our relationships and partnerships and the development of new relationships and partnerships; •federal appropriations and other budgetary matters, including government shutdowns; •our ability to comply with the extensive regulatory framework applicable to our industry, as well as state law and regulations and accrediting agency requirements; •our ability to undertake initiatives to improve the learning experience and attract students who are likely to persist; •changes in enrollment in postsecondary degree-granting institutions and workforce needs; •the competitive environment in which we operate; •our cash needs and expectations regarding cash flow from operations; •our ability to manage and influence our bad debt expense; •the expected effects of our workforce reduction; •our ability to manage, grow, and diversify our business and execute our business initiatives and strategy; and •our financial performance generally.
Forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions, and
expectations of our future performance, taking into account information
currently available to us and are not guarantees of future results. There are a
number of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from the results anticipated by these forward-looking statements. Risks and
uncertainties involved in forward-looking statements include, among others:
•the loss of our ability to receive funds under
or the reduction, elimination, or suspension of tuition assistance;
23
——————————————————————————–
•the effects, duration and severity of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the adverse effects on demand for online education or nursing education as impacts of the pandemic abate, and the actions we have taken or may take in response, particularly atHondros College of Nursing , or HCN, andRasmussen University , or RU, and as a result of working remotely; •risks related to the acquisition ofRasmussen University , including regulatory approvals, limitations on growth and expansion at Rasmussen, effective integration ofRasmussen University's business, and our ability to realize the expected benefits of the acquisition; •our dependence on the effectiveness of our ability to attract students who persist in our institutions' programs; •our inability to effectively market our programs; •adverse effects of changes our institutions make to improve the student experience and enhance their ability to identify and enroll students who are likely to succeed; •our inability to maintain strong relationships with the military and maintain enrollments from military students; •our failure to comply with regulatory and accrediting agency requirements or to maintain institutional accreditation; •our loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV programs or ability to process Title IV financial aid; •our need to successfully adjust to future market demands by updating existing programs and developing new programs; •our dependence on and need to continue to invest in our technology infrastructure; and •risks related to incurring substantial debt under the debt facilities that we have entered into in connection with financing the acquisition ofRasmussen University , the cost of servicing that debt, and our ability in the future to service that debt.
Forward-looking statements should be considered in light of these factors and
the factors described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, including in the “Risk
Factors” section, in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report, and in our
various filings with the
important that you read these factors and the other cautionary statements made
in this Quarterly Report as being applicable to all related forward-looking
statements wherever they appear in this Quarterly Report. If any of these
factors materialize, or if any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our
actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from any
future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. You should also read the more detailed description
of our business in our Annual Report when considering forward-looking
statements. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. We
undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements except
as required by law.
Overview Background
We are a provider of online and on-campus postsecondary education to
approximately 107,800 students through three subsidiary institutions. Our
subsidiary institutions offer programs designed to prepare individuals for
productive contributions to their professions and society, and to offer
opportunities that may advance students in their current professions or help
them prepare for their next career. Our subsidiary institutions are licensed or
otherwise authorized by state authorities, or are in the process of obtaining
such licenses or authorizations, to offer postsecondary education programs to
the extent the institutions believe such licenses or authorizations are
required, and are certified by the
to participate in student financial aid programs authorized under Title IV of
the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, or Title IV programs.
The COVID-19 pandemic did not materially impact our results of operations during
the nine month period ended
our operations remains uncertain. We believe that the pandemic at times did lead
to increased registrations and enrollments across our subsidiary institutions.
As the COVID-19 pandemic abates, we believe near-term demand for our programs is
moderating. For more information on the potential risks related to COVID-19,
please refer to our Annual Report and to the sections entitled “Results of
Operations” and “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report.
Our wholly owned operating subsidiary institutions include the following:
•American Public University System, Inc., or APUS, provides online postsecondary
education to approximately 88,600 adult learners. APUS is an accredited
university system with a history of serving the academic needs of the military,
military-affiliated, public service and service-minded communities through two
brands:
APU.
24
——————————————————————————–
APUS offers 130 degree programs and 112 certificate programs in diverse fields
of study, with a particular focus on those relevant to today’s job market and
emerging fields. Fields of study include traditional academics, such as business
administration, health science, technology, criminal justice, education and
liberal arts, as well as public service-focused fields of study such as national
security, military studies, intelligence, and homeland security. APUS has
institutional accreditation from the
several of its academic programs have specialized accreditation granted by
industry governing organizations. In
re-accreditation, with the next evaluation of accreditation due in 2030-2031. As
part of the process, APUS moved to the Open Pathway designation, which affords
institutions greater opportunity to pursue institutional improvement projects
than the previous Standard Pathway designation.
APUS relies on the ability of the Armed Forces to process service members’
participation in TA programs, and from time to time changes to processes have
impacted the ability of service members to participate in the TA programs. The
Army previously announced that it would transition from its legacy system,
GoArmyEd, to a new system, ArmyIgnitED, which soldiers will use to request TA.
On
determined, the Army deactivated GoArmyEd and announced that access to online TA
requests would be suspended until the launch of ArmyIgnitED on
During the suspension, soldiers, Army education counselors, and education
institutions such as APUS did not have access to the portal and soldiers could
not apply for TA. On
difficulties, suspended ArmyIgnitED. The Army announced on
TA-eligible soldiers could register for courses beginning on or after
2021
came online in ArmyIgnitED. Soldiers could continue to directly register for
courses with the expectation that TA can be retroactively applied for, and the
Army has created a process for soldiers to seek reimbursement. On
the ArmyIgnitED system went live for soldiers seeking to use TA for courses at
APUS. We continue to experience challenges related to system performance,
process changes and software defects, and there is no assurance that the new
portal will ever work correctly or efficiently or will not have continuing
impacts on soldiers’ ability to participate in the TA programs or receive funds
under those programs. The disruption to Army TA and resulting decreases in Army
registrations had an adverse impact on registrations and revenue for the
quarters ended
performance is improving, we expect some impact will continue for the remainder
of 2021.
For information on potential risks associated with APUS, please refer to the
section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report and this Quarterly Report.
•Rasmussen College, LLC, referred to herein as
provides nursing- and health sciences-focused postsecondary education to over
16,900 students at its 23 campuses in six states and online. RU offers a
comprehensive “ladder” of nursing degrees including a pre-licensure Diploma in
Practical Nursing, or PN, an Associate Degree in Nursing, or ADN, and a Bachelor
of Science in Nursing, or BSN, as well as the post-licensure RN to BSN, Master
of Science in Nursing and Doctorate of Nurse Practice. As of
approximately 8,500 students are pursuing nursing degrees at
University
pre-licensure degree programs. RU is institutionally accredited by HLC with an
Open Pathway designation. The Company completed the acquisition of
University
Date. See “Acquisition of
•National Education Seminars, Inc., which we refer to as
Nursing
campuses in
campus in
healthcare communities, addressing the persistent supply-demand gap of nurses
that is evident nation-wide. In addition to
located in the suburban areas of
HCN is institutionally accredited by the
Schools
HCN continued accreditation through
campuses. HCN’s Ohio Diploma in Practical Nursing, or PN, and Associate Degree
in Nursing, or ADN, Programs are approved by the
and the PN Program is accredited by the
for Nursing Education Accreditation
instruction in
Commission for Higher Education
initial accreditation and authorized the admission of the first cohort of
students. NLN CNEA granted HCN accreditation at its
effective
25
——————————————————————————–
increasing the maximum enrollment to 60 students for the 2022 calendar year. HCN
can petition for an additional class size increase in
ABHES annually reviews student achievement indicators, including retention rate,
placement rate, and licensing and credentialing examination pass rate. Under
ABHES policy, ABHES may withdraw accreditation at any time if it determines that
an institution fails to demonstrate at least a 70% retention rate for each
program, a 70% placement rate for each program, and a 70% pass rate on mandatory
licensing and credentialing examinations or fails to meet the state-mandated
results for credentialing or licensure. Alternatively, ABHES may in its
discretion provide an opportunity for a program to come into compliance within a
period of time specified by ABHES, and ABHES may extend the period for achieving
compliance if a program demonstrates improvement over time or other good cause.
For the reporting year ended
ABHES’s threshold requirements for retention rates. Each such program had a
retention rate of between 55% and 69% for the reporting year. HCN submitted its
annual report to ABHES on
areas where benchmarks were not met. We cannot predict how ABHES will respond to
the report.
For information on potential risks associated with HCN, please refer to the
section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report and this Quarterly Report.
Acquisition of
On the Closing Date, we completed the acquisition of
the Rasmussen Acquisition, for an adjusted aggregate purchase price, subject to
post-closing working capital adjustments of
issuing any shares of non-voting preferred stock. Upon completion of the
Rasmussen Acquisition,
APEI. On
ownership and control application to ED seeking approval to participate in the
Title IV programs under our ownership.
other post-closing notices and consents related to the change in ownership. For
the three and nine months ended
which are included in general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated
Statements of Income.
We relied on debt financing pursuant to a credit agreement to fund a portion of
the consideration for the Rasmussen Acquisition. For more information on this
financing, see “- Liquidity and Capital Resources – Liquidity – Acquisition of
Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report.
For more information on the Rasmussen Acquisition, please refer to our Annual
Report, “Note 3. Acquisition Activity” included in the Consolidated Financial
Statements in this Quarterly Report, and the sections entitled “- Regulatory and
Legislative Activity – Rasmussen Acquisition Regulatory Review” below.
26
——————————————————————————–
Cost and Expense Reductions
On
expenses, we initiated a plan to reduce costs. The plan includes a reduction in
force that resulted in the termination of 11 full-time faculty members at APUS,
and 28 non-faculty employees across a variety of roles and departments at APEI
and APUS, representing approximately 3.2% of the APUS full-time faculty
workforce, and 3.1% of the APEI and APUS non-faculty workforce. We completed
this workforce reduction by
benefits related to the workforce reduction in the third quarter of 2021 in
accordance with FASB ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations. We incurred an
aggregate of approximately
employee severance benefits. The reduction in force is expected to result in
pre-tax labor and benefit savings in 2021 of approximately
the range of approximately
These cost savings do not include expenses associated with employee severance
benefits. The actual costs and benefits of the plan are preliminary and may vary
based on various factors, including the timing of implementation and changes in
underlying assumptions and projections. There is no certainty that the program,
or any other expense reduction initiative, will have the intended benefits of
reducing costs and expenses over the long-term, or whether there will be adverse
impacts, including as a result of the loss of valuable employees.
Regulatory and Legislative Activity
On
effective
Employment, or VR&E, benefits against the 48-month cap on veterans education
benefits programs imposed when veterans use more than one benefit program. As a
result, veterans who use VR&E benefits prior to using another veterans education
benefits program, such as the Montgomery GI Bill, or the GI Bill, and the
Post-9/11 GI Bill, can still use up to 48 total months of the other veterans
education benefits programs.
In
borrowers who successfully assert borrower relief claims. Under this new
approach, a borrower will receive full loan relief when evidence shows that the
institution engaged in certain misconduct. This policy rescinds the prior
administration’s formula that generally granted only partial loan relief for
borrower defense claims. ED also announced changes to the process for borrowers
to seek loan relief due to total or permanent disability. Specifically, ED has
eliminated requirements that borrowers with total or permanent disability prove
that they continue to have sufficiently low-incomes for three years following
their loan discharge.
In
issues for future rulemaking sessions, including borrower defenses to repayment,
change in ownership processes, student outcomes transparency, public service
loan forgiveness programs, and gainful employment requirements. Following these
hearings, ED solicited nominations for non-federal negotiators who can serve on
the negotiated rulemaking committees, which ED indicated that it planned to
convene during the third quarter of 2021. On
it was establishing a negotiated rulemaking committee to address borrower
defenses to repayment, public service student loan forgiveness programs,
mandatory pre-dispute arbitration and prohibition of class-action lawsuits,
among other issues. The negotiated rulemaking committee held its first session
in
expected to submit at least one notice of proposed rulemaking on these matters
prior to
effective
Effective
required to be certified by the
or SCHEV, and therefore did not renew its certification before it expired on
will continue to serve our
As a result of this change, APUS will no longer need to seek SCHEV approval
prior to adding any new academic programs.
As part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021,
legislative provisions that alter the application process for federal student
aid, including streamlining the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or
FAFSA. These changes were set to become effective for the 2023-2024 academic
year. On
noting that many of these provisions will not be effective until the 2024-2025
academic year.
On
to Improve Veteran Employment Act, or the THRIVE Act, which amended provisions
related to veterans education programs found in the American Rescue Plan Act and
the Johnny Isakson and
Improvement Act of 2020. The legislation requires the
rapid retraining assistance program, excludes programs pursued solely through
distance learning on a half-time basis or less from the housing stipend
available to those in the retraining program, and requires the Government
Accountability Office to
27
——————————————————————————–
report on the outcomes and effectiveness of retraining programs. The legislation
also requires the
institution has an agreement to provide educational or recruiting services
violates the
Section 1018 of the Johnny Isakson and
and Benefits Improvement Act of 2020, became effective
applied to institutions of higher learning beginning
provision mandates that schools that receive veterans education benefits: (i)
provide
certain other disclosures; (ii) inform
potential eligibility of federal financial aid before packaging or arranging
private student loans or alternative financing programs; (iii) avoid fraudulent
and unduly aggressive recruiting or automatic renewal techniques; (iv) avoid
misrepresentations or payment of incentive compensation; (v) fully disclose
conditions or additional requirements required to obtain any license,
certification, or approval for which the course of education is designed to
provide preparation; (vi) provide
(vii) obtain approval of the institutions’ accrediting agency for new courses or
programs; (viii) maintain a policy to accommodate service members and reservists
to be readmitted if they are temporarily unable to attend due to service
requirements; and (ix) appoint a point of contact to provide academic and
financial aid advising. In
requirements of Section 1018 for the period
2022
will be in compliance with all of the provisions of Section 1018.
In
sailors to use up to 18 semester credit hours annually, previously limited to 12
semester credit hours. Along with the expanded annual credit limit comes new
eligibility requirements, including new requirements as to who can use TA and
when. Eligible sailors can only use TA to fund two courses each quarter of the
fiscal year. The minimum time in service increased from two to three years and
active duty enlisted sailors under 16 years of service and reservists on active
duty orders must have 12 months or more remaining on their current enlistment or
extension as of the course state date to be eligible. Reservists on one-year
orders will no longer be eligible for TA, and sailors who have begun utilizing
TA benefits after only two years of service must pause their TA benefits. These
changes were effective
On
Forgiveness program, or PSLF. ED is implementing a time-limited waiver that
would allow borrowers to count all prior payments toward PSLF, regardless of the
loan program. The waiver will apply to borrowers with Direct Loans, those with
other types of loans that submit a consolidation application into the Direct
Loan Program while the waiver is in effect. The waiver will run through
31, 2022
toward PSLF, even if the service member’s loans were on deferment or
forbearance. This change will allow more service members to pursue loan
forgiveness. ED also plans to implement automatic PSLF crediting for federal
employees and military service members. To further support these efforts, ED
plans to simplify the PSLF application process and improve communication to
PSLF-eligible borrowers.
In
college fraud, the
notices to 70 for-profit higher education institutions, including APUS and RU,
informing them of certain marketing practices the
to be deceptive or unfair and therefore unlawful under the FTC Act. The
indicated that an institution’s receipt of the notice was not an indication that
the institution has engaged in deceptive or unfair conduct. The informational
notices were sent in furtherance of an FTC Act provision permitting penalties
against those engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices with actual
knowledge of their unfair or deceptive nature. The informational notices
informed the institutions that engaging in such practices could subject a
company to civil penalties under that provision. By providing the informational
notices, the
the
also announced that it would be enhancing its enforcement cooperation with other
agencies with oversight of educational institutions, including
Student Aid
2021
Office of Federal Student Aid
against postsecondary institutions that participate in federal student loan,
grant, and work-study programs.
Cohort Default Rate
To remain eligible to participate in Title IV programs, an educational
institution’s student loan cohort default rates must remain below certain
levels. Pursuant to requirements of the Higher Education Act, as amended, if the
cohort default rate for any year exceeds 40%, an institution loses eligibility
to participate in Title IV programs, and if the institution’s cohort default
rate exceeds 30% for three consecutive years, the institution loses eligibility
to participate in Title IV programs. If an institution’s cohort default rate is
equal to or greater than 30% in any year, it must establish a default prevention
task force. In
28
——————————————————————————–
for federal fiscal year 2018, with ED reporting a 9.4% cohort default rate for
APUS, a 7.8% cohort default rate for RU, and a 8.1% cohort default rate for HCN.
Additional information regarding student loan default rates, prior year default
rates, and potential risks associated with them is available in our Annual
Report.
Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds
In
Security Act, or the CARES Act, in response to COVID-19 and its related effects.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many higher education institutions shifted to
distance learning as campuses shut down as a result of the public health
emergency. The CARES Act included provisions designed to provide relief to
higher education institutions in connection with the pandemic, including by
creating the
authorized ED to allocate HEERF funding based on a statutory formula that
accounted for the relative share of full-time students who are Pell Grant
recipients and that excluded students who were enrolled exclusively in distance
education courses prior to the COVID-19 emergency from the calculation. Wholly
online institutions such as APUS were therefore not eligible to receive an
allocation of funding under the CARES Act HEERF. The CARES Act required
recipient institutions to use at least 50% of their HEERF funds to provide
emergency grants to students for expenses related to the disruption of campus
operations due to COVID-19. The CARES Act also permitted institutions to use up
to 50% of their HEERF funds to cover any costs associated with significant
changes to the delivery of instruction due to COVID-19, with certain exceptions.
By
Act HEERF funds to eligible students.
In addition, as a result of the CARES Act and subsequent administrative
actions, ED implemented a temporary freeze on payments and interest accruals for
federal student loans. This administrative forbearance period began on
2020
In
and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, or the CRRSAA, which contained
several education-related provisions. The CRRSAA appropriated an additional
education institutions. The CRRSAA HEERF allocation formula differs from the
CARES Act HEERF formula in several ways, including new allocations for
institutions based on the number of students enrolled exclusively in distance
education and included certain restrictions regarding allowable uses of CRRSAA
HEERF funds. Under this formula, ED allocated approximately
and
their allocated CRRSAA HEERF funds to eligible students.
In
which includes an additional
incorporates CRRSAA’s restrictions regarding allowable uses of HEERF funds.
ARPA’s HEERF III allocation formula decreases the amount of funds allocated to
for-profit institutions. Under this formula, ED allocated approximately
for APUS and
allocated HEERF III funds to eligible students during the third quarter. HCN
declined its HEERF III allocation.
ARPA also includes a provision that amends the provision of the Higher Education
Act of 1964, as amended, or the HEA, that, as a condition of participation in
the Title IV programs, prohibits a for-profit institution from deriving more
than 90% of its revenue (as computed by ED) on a cash accounting basis (except
for certain institutional loans) from Title IV programs for any fiscal year. For
more information on the so-called 90/10 Rule, please refer to our Annual Report.
ARPA modifies the HEA’s 90/10 Rule to require that a for-profit institution
derive not less than 10 percent of its revenue from sources other than “federal
education assistance funds”. ARPA provides that the amendment applies to
institutional fiscal years beginning on or after
ARPA provides that the amendment is subject to the HEA’s master calendar
requirements and negotiated rulemaking and that such negotiated rulemaking shall
commence no earlier than
provision is not expected to go into effect until
ARPA does not define “federal education assistance funds.” We expect such
definition to be developed as part of the required negotiated rulemaking and
anticipate that ED would seek to include TA and
scope of the definition. At this time, we cannot predict the impact of the ARPA
90/10 Rule on our business, including because we cannot predict how ED will
implement the ARPA 90/10 Rule provision. We also cannot predict the likelihood
that
with respect to relevant sources of funds or other aspects of the calculation.
For example, other recent congressional proposals have focused on decreasing the
limit on Title IV funds from 90% to 85%. Such proposals, or other similar
legislation, should they become law, could have a material adverse impact on our
financial condition and results of operation.
29
——————————————————————————–
On
individuals who have successfully completed a nursing education program approved
by OBN to receive a temporary license to practice as an RN or LPN before taking
the National Council Licensure Examination, or NCLEX. Graduates of OBN-approved
nursing education programs, such as HCN’s programs, were permitted to apply for
a temporary license that was valid until
2021
individual must have completed the nursing education program no more than two
years before the date of submitting the Licensure by Examination application,
the individual cannot receive a temporary license if they have a prior NCLEX
failure in any state, if they have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to any
felony, or have failed a drug test as determined by the Board. The emergency
relief law expired on
The postsecondary education regulatory landscape is complex and continues to
evolve, and the foregoing discussion does not address all of the laws and
regulations that may materially affect our business, financial condition, and
results of operations. Additional information on the regulation of our business,
including certain regulatory developments in 2021 that occurred prior to the
filing of our Annual Report, is available in “Business – Regulatory Environment”
in Item 1 of Part I of our Annual Report. We cannot predict the extent to which
the aforementioned regulatory activity or any other potential regulatory or
legislative activity may impact us or our institutions, nor can we predict the
possible associated burdens and costs. Additional information regarding the
potential risks associated with the regulation of postsecondary education and
our business is available in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual
Report and this Quarterly Report.
Rasmussen Acquisition Regulatory Review
The Rasmussen Acquisition was required to be reported to, and in some cases
approved by, various education regulatory bodies. An institution must obtain ED
approval for a change in ownership and control in order to continue to
participate in Title IV programs under the new ownership. ED does not provide
pre-closing approval.
In
University’s
growth restrictions on the institution, which included maintaining limitations
on new programs and locations that were already in place and imposing a cap on
the number of students that participate in Title IV programs that can be
enrolled. Additionally, ED continued to require
periodic financial and enrollment reports, a requirement that it had imposed on
RU in connection with the financial responsibility letter of credit described
below. On
ownership and control application to ED seeking approval to participate in the
Title IV programs under our ownership.
a Temporary Provisional Program Participation Agreement, or TPPPA, effective as
of
Title IV funds during the period of ED’s review of the change in ownership
application. The TPPPA continues the growth restrictions that ED imposed as a
result of the
The TPPPA specifies that after ED reviews and accepts financial statements and
compliance audits that cover one complete fiscal year of RU’s Title IV
participation under APEI’s ownership, RU may seek to have the enrollment cap
removed and may seek approval for new programs that replace current programs.
The TPPPA also specifies that at least until after ED reviews and accepts
financial statements and compliance audits that cover the second complete fiscal
year of RU’s Title IV participation under APEI’s ownership, RU must seek
pre-approval for new locations, new programs that are not replacing current
programs, and other changes. The growth restrictions under the TPPPA could limit
or adversely affect
restricting its ability to serve additional students, particularly additional
nursing students, and limiting its ability to continue to evolve to address
current needs by providing new or changed programs.
pursuing other post-closing notices and consents related to the change in
ownership.
State agencies, accreditors, boards of nursing, and other relevant regulators
also require action with respect to the Rasmussen Acquisition. In some
instances, these bodies required prior approval before the change in ownership
could be completed. For example, HLC requires approval before the closing of a
transaction in order for an institution to maintain accredited status after
closing. The parties submitted an application to HLC for pre-closing approval of
the change in ownership, and HLC conducted focused site visits related to the
application in February and
application regarding the change in control. An additional site visit is
required within six months of the Closing Date. Additionally, some regulators
will require approval after a change in ownership in order to continue proper
licensure, accreditation, approval, or authorization.
ED evaluates institutions on an annual basis for compliance with specified
financial responsibility standards, including a complex formula based on line
items from the institution’s audited financial statements. The formula focuses
on three financial ratios: (1) equity ratio (which measures the institution’s
capital resources, financial viability, and ability to borrow); (2) primary
reserve ratio (which measures the institution’s viability and liquidity); and
(3) net income ratio (which measures the
30
——————————————————————————–
institution’s profitability or ability to operate within its means). Generally,
an institution’s financial ratios must yield a composite score of at least 1.5
for the institution to be deemed financially responsible. An institution which
does not meet ED’s minimum composite score of 1.5 can demonstrate financial
responsibility by meeting the “zone alternative” or posting a letter of credit
in favor of ED. The “zone alternative” includes a delayed method of cash funding
for Title IV aid, and the
providing of additional information to ED, upon request. As of
2020
1.5. RU elected to post a letter of credit with ED totaling
represents 10% of the Title IV program funds received by RU during its most
recently completed fiscal year. Upon the closing of the RU Acquisition, APEI was
required to fund this letter of credit using a restricted deposit account that
required a deposit of 105%, or
Under the TPPPA for RU described above, a letter of credit will continue to be
required at least until ED reviews and accepts financial statements and
compliance audits that cover one complete fiscal year of RU’s Title IV
participation under APEI’s ownership. Additionally, RU is required to make Title
IV disbursements to eligible students and parents under the heightened cash
monitoring payment method, or HCM1. Under HCM1,
make Title IV disbursements to eligible students and parents and pay any credit
balances before the institution requests or receives funds for the amount of
those disbursements from ED.
APUS, RU and HCN Compliance Reviews
In
program during the 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 award years. The program review
remains open and ongoing. At this time, we cannot predict the outcome of the
program review, when it will be completed, or whether ED will place any
liability or other limitations on RU as a result of the review.
On
review. The review, which was completed in
administration of Title IV programs, with a focus on award years 2019-2020 and
2020-2021. The program review is pending while ED is reviewing the data
collected.
Reportable Segments
During the third quarter of 2021, we revised our reportable segments and
updated the results for the prior period to conform to the current period
presentation. As of
segments:
•American Public University System Segment, or APUS Segment. This segment
reflects the operational activities of APUS and was previously included within
the former APEI Segment;
•Rasmussen University Segment, or RU Segment. This segment reflects the
operational activities of
•Hondros College of Nursing Segment, or HCN Segment. This segment reflects the
operational activities of HCN.
Prior to the third quarter of 2021, the Company had two reportable segments: the
Post-acquisition, the Company has three reportable segments: the APUS Segment,
which was previously included within the APEI Segment; the Rasmussen Segment;
and the HCN Segment. The APEI Segment previously reported the results of both
APUS and remaining unallocated Company expenses. Adjustments to reconcile
segment results to the Consolidated Financial Statements are included in
“Corporate and Other”, which primarily includes unallocated corporate activity
and eliminations, which generally were previously reported within the APEI
Segment. Prior periods have been updated to conform to the revised presentation.
Summary of Results
As discussed above, we completed the Rasmussen Acquisition on
Our results of operations for the three and nine months ended
include the results of RU from the Closing Date through
did not consolidate the financial results of the RU Segment prior to the Closing
Date. Accordingly, the financial results of each period presented are not
directly comparable. This discussion highlights changes in the APUS and HCN
segments, as those results are fully included in each period.
For the three months ended
increased to
prior year period. Our operating margins decreased to 1.2% from 4.2% for the
three months ended
the three months ended
million
31
——————————————————————————–
decrease of
consolidated revenue increased to
compared to the prior period. Our operating margins decreased to 5.3% from 6.4%
for the nine month periods ended
period. Net income decreased to
For the three months ended
Net course registrations at APUS for the three months ended
decreased to approximately 83,100 from approximately 90,300, or approximately
8.0%, compared to the prior year period. APUS Segment operating margins
increased to 11.9% from 10.6% for the three months ended
compared to the prior year period.
For the nine months ended
year period. Net course registrations at APUS for the nine months ended
264,700, or approximately 2.3%, compared to the prior year period. APUS Segment
operating margins increased to 14.7% from 14.2% for the nine months ended
The decreases in APUS Segment revenue were due to the decreases in net course
registrations which we believe were due to a moderation in near-term demand for
online education due to the abatement of the COVID-19 pandemic, and also in part
to the temporary suspension and disruption of the Army’s TA program.
From the Closing Date through
million
ended
For the three months ended
Total enrollment at HCN for the three months ended
to approximately 2,300 from approximately 2,000, or approximately 18.9%, as
compared to the prior year period. HCN Segment operating margins decreased to
4.0% from 4.9% for the three months ended
prior year period.
For the nine months ended
period. HCN Segment operating margins increased to 4.0% from negative 1.8% for
the nine months ended
For more information on Army TA program suspension and delays, their related
impacts on the Company, and related risks, please refer to “Overview-Background”
above and the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report.
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
For information regarding our Critical Accounting Policies and Use of
Estimates, see the “Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates” section
of “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” in our Annual Report.
Results of Operations
Below we have included a discussion of our operating results and material
changes in our operating results during the three and nine months ended
2020
seasonal or other variations in our enrollments and the level of expenses in our
reportable segments. Our student population varies as a result of new
enrollments, graduations, student attrition, the success of our marketing
programs, and other reasons that we cannot always anticipate. We expect
quarterly fluctuations in operating results to continue as a result of various
enrollment patterns and changes in revenue and expenses, including due to the
Rasmussen Acquisition.
32
——————————————————————————–
We believe the decrease in net course registrations at APUS for the three and
nine months ended
suspension and disruption of the Army’s TA program on
from delays in the transition from its legacy system, GoArmyEd, to a new system,
ArmyIgnitED, and a moderation in near-term demand for online education due to
the abatement of the COVID-19 pandemic. For more information on the impacts of
the Army TA program delays on the Company and the potential risks related to
this, please refer to “Overview” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operation and the section entitled “Risk
Factors” in this Quarterly Report.
We believe that the increase in enrollment at HCN for the three and nine
months ended
part to an increase in demand for nursing education, a change in the competitive
environment due to COVID-19, an increase in marketing expenditures, and the
continued impact of initiatives implemented in 2019 and 2020, such as the direct
entry ADN Program and the institutional affordability grant. We cannot predict
whether our initiatives and efforts will continue to be successful over the long
term and cannot guarantee continued enrollment and revenue growth in our HCN
Segment. The success of these efforts could also be adversely affected by future
impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic or a further moderation of or decrease in the
demand for nursing education as the pandemic abates. For more information on the
impacts of COVID-19 on the Company and the potential risks related to COVID-19,
please refer to “Overview-Background” in this Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation and the section
entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report and this Quarterly Report.
Our consolidated results for the three and nine months ended
and 2020 reflect the operations of our APUS and HCN Segments only and include
the results of our RU Segment from the Closing Date. We did not consolidate the
RU Segment prior to the Closing Date. Rasmussen enrollment was approximately
16,900 during the three months ended
17,200 during the three months ended
in enrollment may have been caused, in part, due to a moderation in near-term
demand for Rasmussen’s programs due to the abatement of the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, because we have only recently acquired
provide a full assessment of the factors that could have led to the decline in
enrollments at
For a more detailed discussion of our results by reportable segment, refer to
“Analysis of Operating Results by Reportable Segment” below.
© Edgar Online, source
[ad_2]
Comments are closed.